New SMAC quizzes available.Test your Alpha Centauri knowledge! Chess is back.Challenge someone!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Manic Monday on February 27, 2023, 01:31:30 PMQuote from: Trenacker on February 26, 2023, 07:00:58 PMBut Lal never made sense to me as XO. It seems too obvious that, to the well-educated, he was recognizable as a problematic quantity, even if it might not have been clear to them that he was a full-blown sociopath. I don't see why the U.N. would have put someone like Lal in such a position.OH - you meant YANG and your fingers forgot. Now it all makes sense. I don't disgree at all. Perhaps his hive tendencies didn't show until he got his shot to practice them on Planet? He's very capable otherwise, I do think, what with his attitude towards self discipline and self improvement.Back on Miriam? I've been on the record as long as I've been in the community -see my Sister Miriam De-uglified thread redone on this forum- that, coming at it as a faction modder artist who's made a lot of leaderheads, Miriam is also a visual hatchet job. She's Dana Carvey's Church Lady character with red hair and an army, not coincidentally played by the least attractive-looking human being of the original seven.Yes, Yang. Apologies for the error. Based on the fictional biography prepared by Michael Ely for the SMAC website, the psych screeners already perceived that there was something "off" about Yang. They just calculated that he was worth the risk. Still, it seems odd that they would freight Garland with a guy they knew would make an ideal mutineer.Yes, that is fair to say about Miriam, who is every bit as much a stereotype as the beautiful Hippie or the collectivist Asian.
Quote from: Trenacker on February 26, 2023, 07:00:58 PMBut Lal never made sense to me as XO. It seems too obvious that, to the well-educated, he was recognizable as a problematic quantity, even if it might not have been clear to them that he was a full-blown sociopath. I don't see why the U.N. would have put someone like Lal in such a position.OH - you meant YANG and your fingers forgot. Now it all makes sense. I don't disgree at all. Perhaps his hive tendencies didn't show until he got his shot to practice them on Planet? He's very capable otherwise, I do think, what with his attitude towards self discipline and self improvement.Back on Miriam? I've been on the record as long as I've been in the community -see my Sister Miriam De-uglified thread redone on this forum- that, coming at it as a faction modder artist who's made a lot of leaderheads, Miriam is also a visual hatchet job. She's Dana Carvey's Church Lady character with red hair and an army, not coincidentally played by the least attractive-looking human being of the original seven.
But Lal never made sense to me as XO. It seems too obvious that, to the well-educated, he was recognizable as a problematic quantity, even if it might not have been clear to them that he was a full-blown sociopath. I don't see why the U.N. would have put someone like Lal in such a position.
it's there in the source material somewhat, and you've very much underlined in RTD, that mission planning was a political circle-jerk/nightmare...
Are the Society of Free Thinkers intended to be the same group as the Society of Free Thought?